Microsoft KB Archive Search

Notice: This website is an unofficial Microsoft Knowledge Base (hereinafter KB) archive and is intended to provide a reliable access to deleted content from Microsoft KB. All KB articles are owned by Microsoft Corporation. Read full disclaimer for more details.

  1. Home
  2. The results are different in the Warehouse Card report (16785) and in the Trial Balance report (16702) in the Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV

The results are different in the Warehouse Card report (16785) and in the Trial Balance report (16702) in the Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV

View products that this article applies to.

This article applies to Microsoft Dynamics NAV for the Greek (gr) language locale.

↑ Back to the top

Symptoms

If you click to select both the Automatic Cost Posting check box and Expected Cost Posting check box in the Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV, the incorrect general ledger entries that is created by the expected cost amount is not reversed. Therefore, the result in the Trial Balance report (16702) differs from the result in the Warehouse Card report (16785). 
This problem occurs in the following products:
  • The Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 Service Pack 1 (SP1)
  • The Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 5.0 Service Pack 1 (SP1)

↑ Back to the top

Cause

This problem occurs because the item costs are calculated two times in the general ledger entries. The cost is calculated as the expected cost one time and the cost is calculated as the actual cost another time.

↑ Back to the top

Resolution

Hotfix information

A supported hotfix is now available from Microsoft. However, it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to systems that are experiencing this specific problem. This hotfix may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 service pack or the next Microsoft Dynamics NAV version that contains this hotfix.

Note In special cases, charges that are ordinarily incurred for support calls may be canceled if a Technical Support Professional for Microsoft Dynamics and related products determines that a specific update will resolve your problem. The usual support costs will apply to additional support questions and issues that do not qualify for the specific update in question.

↑ Back to the top



Installation information

Microsoft provides programming examples for illustration only, without warranty either expressed or implied. This includes, but is not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. This article assumes that you are familiar with the programming language that is being demonstrated and with the tools that are used to create and to debug procedures. Microsoft support engineers can help explain the functionality of a particular procedure, but they will not modify these examples to provide added functionality or construct procedures to meet your specific requirements.

Note Before you install this hotfix, verify that all Microsoft Navision client users are logged off the system. This includes Microsoft Navision Application Services (NAS) client users. You should be the only client user who is logged on when you implement this hotfix.

To implement this hotfix, you must have a developer license.

We recommend that the user account in the Windows Logins window or in the Database Logins window be assigned the "SUPER" role ID. If the user account cannot be assigned the "SUPER" role ID, you must verify that the user account has the following permissions:
  • The Modify permission for the object that you will be changing.
  • The Execute permission for the System Object ID 5210 object and for the System Object ID 9015 object.


Note You do not have to have rights to the data stores unless you have to perform data repair.

Code changes

Note Always test code fixes in a controlled environment before you apply the fixes to your production computers.
To resolve this problem, follow these steps: 
  1. Change the code in the BufferInvtPosting function in the Inventory Posting To G/L codeunit (5802) as follow:
    Existing code
    ...
    // Dionisis Calculate Cost Differently for Manufacturing Entries.
    IF "Expected Cost" THEN BEGIN
    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,ExpCostToPost,CostExpected,"Expected Cost Posted to G/L",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",FALSE,
    "Posted Cost Component 1","Posted Cost Component 2","Posted Cost Component 3","Posted Cost Component 4",
    "Posted Cost Component 5");
    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,ExpCostToPostACY,"Cost Amount (Expected) (ACY)","Exp. Cost Posted to G/L (ACY)",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",TRUE,
    PostedCost1ACY,PostedCost2ACY,PostedCost3ACY,PostedCost4ACY,PostedCost5ACY);
    END ELSE BEGIN
    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,CostToPost,CostActual,"Cost Posted to G/L",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",FALSE,
    "Posted Cost Component 1","Posted Cost Component 2","Posted Cost Component 3","Posted Cost Component 4",
    "Posted Cost Component 5");
    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,CostToPostACY,"Cost Amount (Actual) (ACY)","Cost Posted to G/L (ACY)",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",TRUE,
    PostedCost1ACY,PostedCost2ACY,PostedCost3ACY,PostedCost4ACY,PostedCost5ACY);
    END;
    ...
    Replacement code
    ...
    // Dionisis Calculate Cost Differently for Manufacturing Entries.

    //Add the following lines.
    // IF "Expected Cost" THEN BEGIN
    IF "Expected Cost" OR InvtSetup."Expected Cost Posting to G/L" THEN BEGIN
    //End of the lines.

    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,ExpCostToPost,CostExpected,"Expected Cost Posted to G/L",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",FALSE,
    "Posted Cost Component 1","Posted Cost Component 2","Posted Cost Component 3","Posted Cost Component 4",
    "Posted Cost Component 5");
    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,ExpCostToPostACY,"Cost Amount (Expected) (ACY)","Exp. Cost Posted to G/L (ACY)",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",TRUE,
    PostedCost1ACY,PostedCost2ACY,PostedCost3ACY,PostedCost4ACY,PostedCost5ACY);

    //Add the following lines.
    // END ELSE BEGIN
    END;
    IF NOT "Expected Cost" THEN BEGIN
    //End of the lines.

    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,CostToPost,CostActual,"Cost Posted to G/L",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",FALSE,
    "Posted Cost Component 1","Posted Cost Component 2","Posted Cost Component 3","Posted Cost Component 4",
    "Posted Cost Component 5");
    CalcCostToPost(
    ValueEntry,CostToPostACY,"Cost Amount (Actual) (ACY)","Cost Posted to G/L (ACY)",PostToGL,"Expected Cost",TRUE,
    PostedCost1ACY,PostedCost2ACY,PostedCost3ACY,PostedCost4ACY,PostedCost5ACY);
    END;
    ...
  2. Change the code in the BufferInvtPosting function in the Inventory Posting To G/L codeunit (5802) to the following:
    …

    // Find Actual Cost // Dionisis changed with valuation cost
    // CASE "Item Ledger Entry Type" OF
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Purchase:
    // // GR0010.begin
    // // CostActual := "Entry Valuation Cost"; // "Cost Amount (Actual)"; // GR004
    // CostActual := "Cost Amount (Actual)";
    // // GR0010.end
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Sale,
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::"Positive Adjmt.",
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::"Negative Adjmt.",
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Transfer,
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Consumption,
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Output:
    // // GR0010.begin
    // // CostActual := "Entry Valuation Cost";
    // CostActual := "Cost Amount (Actual)";
    // // GR0010.end
    // END;

    // Find Expected Cost // Dionisis changed with valuation cost
    // CASE "Item Ledger Entry Type" OF
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Purchase:
    // // GR0010.begin
    // //CostExpected := "Valuation Expected Cost"; // "Cost Amount (Expected)"; // GR0004
    // CostExpected := "Cost Amount (Expected)";
    // // GR0010.end
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Sale:
    // // GR0010.begin
    // // CostExpected := "Valuation Expected Cost";
    // CostExpected := "Cost Amount (Expected)";
    // // GR0010 end
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::"Positive Adjmt.",
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::"Negative Adjmt.",
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Transfer,
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Consumption,
    // "Item Ledger Entry Type"::Output:
    // // GR0010.begin
    // //CostExpected := "Entry Valuation Cost"; //CostExpected := "Invoiced Quantity" * "Valuation Cost Per Unit";
    // CostExpected := "Cost Amount (Actual)";
    // // GR0010.end
    // END;
    CostActual := "Cost Amount (Actual)";
    CostExpected := "Cost Amount (Expected)";
    …
  3. Change the code in the CalcExpCost function in the Inventory Posting To G/L codeunit (5802) as follow:
    Existing code
    ...
    QtyNotInv := Quantity - QtyNotInv;
    AdjdCost := ROUND(AdjdCost * QtyNotInv / Quantity,RoundPrecision);
    ...
    Replacement code
    ...
    QtyNotInv := Quantity - QtyNotInv;

    //Add the following line.
    IF QtyNotInv <> 0 THEN

    AdjdCost := ROUND(AdjdCost * QtyNotInv / Quantity,RoundPrecision);
    ...
  4. Change the code in the CalcPeriodAverageCost function in the Valuation Management codeunit (16783) as follow:
    Existing code
    ...
    WITH Item DO BEGIN
    SETRANGE("Date Filter",InventoryPeriod."Starting Date",InventoryPeriod."Ending Date");
    SETFILTER("Location Filter",LocationFilter);
    CALCFIELDS("Valuation Purchases Qty","Valuation Purchases (LCY)","Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)",
    "Valuation Output Cost","Output Qty","Assembled Qty","Valuation Assembly Cost",
    "Valuation Transfers Qty","Valuation Transfers (LCY)");
    CurrPeriodCost := "Valuation Purchases (LCY)" + "Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)" + "Valuation Output Cost" +
    "Valuation Assembly Cost" + "Valuation Transfers (LCY)";
    CurrPeriodQty := "Valuation Purchases Qty" + "Output Qty" + "Assembled Qty" + "Valuation Transfers Qty";
    IF "Production Method" <> "Production Method"::" " THEN
    CalcCostPerCostComp;
    END;

    CalcValuationCostPerUnit;
    ...
    Replacement code
    ...
    WITH Item DO BEGIN
    SETRANGE("Date Filter",InventoryPeriod."Starting Date",InventoryPeriod."Ending Date");
    SETFILTER("Location Filter",LocationFilter);

    //Add the following lines.
    //CALCFIELDS("Valuation Purchases Qty","Valuation Purchases (LCY)","Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)",
    // "Valuation Output Cost","Output Qty","Assembled Qty","Valuation Assembly Cost",
    // "Valuation Transfers Qty","Valuation Transfers (LCY)");
    // CurrPeriodCost := "Valuation Purchases (LCY)" + "Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)" + "Valuation Output Cost" +
    // "Valuation Assembly Cost" + "Valuation Transfers (LCY)";
    // CurrPeriodQty := "Valuation Purchases Qty" + "Output Qty" + "Assembled Qty" + "Valuation Transfers Qty";
    CALCFIELDS("Valuation Purchases Qty","Valuation Purchases (LCY)","Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)",
    "Valuation Output Cost","Output Qty","Assembled Qty","Valuation Assembly Cost",
    "Inbound Transfer Qty","Inbound Transfers (LCY)");
    IF IsAvgCostCalcTypeItem THEN BEGIN
    CurrPeriodCost := "Valuation Purchases (LCY)" + "Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)" + "Valuation Output Cost" +
    "Valuation Assembly Cost";
    CurrPeriodQty := "Valuation Purchases Qty" + "Output Qty" + "Assembled Qty";
    END ELSE BEGIN
    CurrPeriodCost := "Valuation Purchases (LCY)" + "Valuation Expd. Cost (Purch.)" + "Valuation Output Cost" +
    "Valuation Assembly Cost" + "Inbound Transfers (LCY)";
    CurrPeriodQty := "Valuation Purchases Qty" + "Output Qty" + "Assembled Qty" + "Inbound Transfer Qty";
    END;
    //End of the lines.

    IF "Production Method" <> "Production Method"::" " THEN
    CalcCostPerCostComp;
    END;

    CalcValuationCostPerUnit;
    ...


Prerequisites

You must have one of the following products installed to apply this hotfix:
  • The Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 Service Pack 1 (SP1)
  • The Greek version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 5.0 Service Pack 1 (SP1)

Removal information

You cannot remove this hotfix.

↑ Back to the top

Status

Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section.

↑ Back to the top

Note This is a "FAST PUBLISH" article created directly from within the Microsoft support organization. The information contained herein is provided as-is in response to emerging issues. As a result of the speed in making it available, the materials may include typographical errors and may be revised at any time without notice. See Terms of Use for other considerations.

↑ Back to the top

Keywords: kb, kbmbspartner, kbmbscodefix, kbqfe, kbmbsquickpub, kbmbsmigrate, kbsurveynew, kbnoloc

↑ Back to the top

Article Info
Article ID : 2464237
Revision : 2
Created on : 9/21/2018
Published on : 9/21/2018
Exists online : False
Views : 243